Next Letter

PRIOR to [ROBERT SUTTON, LORD LEXINGTON], 5/16 October 1712, Versailles

PRIOR to [ROBERT SUTTON, LORD LEXINGTON], 5/16 October 1712, Versailles

Table of contents

    1712.1016.Fa

    My Lord1

    According to what I wrote to your Lordsp
    in my last, I am to advise you that
    vpon a Memorial wch I gaue in on
    Saturday, mons:r de Torcy gaue Me for
    answer, that as to these words follow­
    ­ing. in the Act of Renonciation

    Apres les mots
    Passé et transmis.
    "On doit inserer les noms des person­
    "­nes sur lesquels le Droit de Suc­
    "­cession seroit declaré appartenir
    "en vertu de la Renonciation
    .

    The King has consented that the Clause
    Ie veux et consens. shall be inserted
    wch I beleiue will be found satisfactory
    to the Ministry in Eng: and conforma­
    ­ble to the Instructions wch yor
    Lordsp has vpon that Head.
    So that as now all our Additions to
    the Act of Renonciation are agreed to
    yo:r Lordsp will haue no further
    [...]˂diffi˃culty 2 vpon that affair

    I send the Clause by expreſs into Eng:~
    and at the same time advise them
    that I haue likewise transmitted
    it to yo:r Lordsp

    I am glad in the first Essay of my facul­
    ­ty of Plenipo: to haue been able to
    send you and my other Patrons in
    Eng: so ample, so plain, and I hope
    so vnexceptionable a Clause:

    I haue no more time than to
    tell you the Courrier stays, while
    I repeat to your Lordsp My3 being
    Ever wth respect

    My Lord
    yo:r Lordsp's most obt and
    most humble Sert

    MPrior.

    2.

    Endorsed:
    Mr Prior Versailles
    16/5 Oct:
    recd~ 26.

    Notes
    1.
    Lexington is identified as the recipient of this letter in Prior's letter to Bolingbroke, 1712.1017.Fa.
    2.
    By overwriting, Prior carefully modified the original text to settle on the word difficulty. It is not clear how many of the letters diffi were present in the original text and how many are the result of Prior's revision, although tr may underly di and a horizontal line runs through the word across the first five letters.
    3.
    The awkward shape of the majuscule M strongly suggests that Prior made a false start with his initial pen stroke.