Next Letter

PRIOR to [HENRY ST. JOHN, VISCOUNT BOLINGBROKE], 17/28 December 1712, Versailles

PRIOR to [HENRY ST. JOHN, VISCOUNT BOLINGBROKE], 17/28 December 1712, Versailles

Table of contents

    1712.1228.Fa

    11

    My Lord.3

    I arrived at Paris the 1 [...]˂8˃.th˂/7˃ 4 Sunday, ha­
    ­ving gon the day before about 4
    leagues out of my way, to meet
    the D: d'Aumond, who was then
    on his way to England; I thought
    my so doing showed respect to
    a Man of his Quality, and I hope
    the conversation I had with Him
    may set Him right, as to some Com­
    ­pany, that may probably offer
    themselves to Him vpon his ar­
    ­rival at London.

    I went on Munday to Versailles, and
    immediately found a Gentleman
    with a complement from monsr
    Torcy; how much he long'd to
    see Me &c wch, as soon as He did,
    He fell vpon the Topic of Tournay
    and the Elec:r of Bavaria: He will
    not allow That Prince's Interest to
    be sufficiently secured, since He
    is only to haue a temporary and
    conditional provision allowed to
    Him, in those provinces, of wch
    the States are in the mean time
    to be the real Masters; who (not­
    ­withstanding what is now stipu­
    ­lated for Him,) may turn Him
    out at their pleasure, except5
    some Guarantée is formed in his
    behalf to put it out of their power
    as it may be in their Will to
    hurt Him: not but that all
    this while the Court of France
    is very well pleased with what
    the Queen has done, but that
    They wish She would ˂˄ do˃6 more and
    that some further temperament
    may easily be found to secure
    the States from any apprehensi­
    ­ons they may lye vnder, from
    the Elec:rs being too near them,
    and skreen that Prince's honour
    a little, from being (as mons:r
    Torcy calls it,) vnder Dutch
    Guards: I need not tell yo:r Argu­
    ­ments, (for I had them from
    you, my Lord,) wch I vsed to
    mons:r Torcy vpon this occasion,
    in short the whole Matter lyes
    so that the Peace may go on
    vpon it, (w:ch is the point We
    sought) and the Queen may do
    more for this Prince, as her
    Interest and Generosity persuade;
    Count Monostrole7 saw mons:r de
    Torcy the same Night, pay'd Me
    a visit the next Morning, and
    exprest in the civilest terms ima­
    ­ginable the great obligations
    3
    his Master has to Her Maj:ty but
    still insisting, that She is the Ar­
    ­bitresse of Europe, and may, as
    She pleases, relieue a Prince
    who will haue an eternal sence
    of her Goodneſs: Monostrole wen[t] 8
    the same day to Compeigne to
    the Elec:r and you will hear
    more of Him yet before I
    close my letter.

    The next Morning I had an audience
    of the King, in wch I repeated
    to Him (according to my Instruc­
    ­tions) the desire Her Majty had,
    that the Negociation, which had
    been too long obstructed, should
    be brought to a speedy conclusion,
    and that Her Majty had given
    such orders to Her plenipoten­
    ­tiaries at Utrecht as might
    most effectually oblige the States
    Gen:al with˂out˃9 delay to enter into
    her measures, and such as might
    at the same time most properly
    conduce to favour the El:r of
    Bavaria's interests as his Ma­
    ­jesty desired: He interrupted
    Me, and say'd, He hoped the
    giving vp Tournay would haue
    that effect, and that Her
    Maj:ty could not oblige Him
    more in any thing; that He desired
    as much as possible the Conclu­
    ­sion of the Peace, and a
    good Correspondence between
    the Nations, and did and would
    do all he could to obtain it;
    of w:ch He say'd, I should assure
    Her Majty and return his
    thanks to Her for the letter
    qu'Elle a eu la bonté de
    m'écrire
    .10

    I went on to say, there remained
    between their Majties some
    bounds in N: America to be
    regulated, and some general
    points to be settled vpon [...] ˂w:ch˃ a
    treaty of Commerce [...] might be
    founded. He answered, that
    his Ministers had received his
    full orders vpon those heads;
    As to what I added that Her
    Majty had named the D: of
    Shrewsbury her Ambass:r for
    France, he answered that the
    Queen had don Him a great
    pleasure
    in naming a per­
    ­son of the Merit and quality
    of that Lord.

    I haue gon over the other points
    of my Instructions with [...]11
    5
    Mons:r de Torcy: as to the difficulties
    from Madrid concerning the tenure
    of Sicily, and it's remaining any
    way feudatory to Spain, I haue
    for answer, that the most C: King
    vnderstands that the Cession of
    that Kingdom is agreed and shal[l]12
    be executed in the Sence in wch
    Her Majty has vnderstood it,
    and to be clogged with no other
    restriction than that of it's being
    neither alienated or changed with­
    ­out the consent of Spain;
    and that the Marq: de Monteleon
    has full powers from K: Philip
    to declare Himself vpon that
    point to Her Maj:ties satisfaction
    of this I beleiue yo:r Lordsp will
    be satisfied before you receiue
    my letter, for I mett the Marq:
    de Monteleon near Dover, and
    He told Me the substance of what
    I now write to you.

    As to the Bariere insisted on by the
    D: of Savoy, mons:r Torcy refers
    Me to his last letter to your
    Lordsp, in w:ch He plainly says
    That whole affair is adjusted as
    much as ever it will be; that
    His royal higneſs has liberty to
    fortify his frontiere, vpon the
    private assurance given that
    He will not fortify Pignerol; that
    He has more on the side of
    France than He has had for
    140 years past, and that what
    He now asks is the ancient
    Domaine of the Crown that
    He has more reason to be satis­
    ­fied than any Prince in the
    War, and that the King hopes
    He will not fatigue the Queen
    any further, after Her having
    obtained such vast acquisitions
    for Him.

    The Cardinal de Tremouille13 writes
    from Rome to this Court that 1500
    Germans are ready to embark at
    Naples in pretence for Sardinia
    but in reality for [...]˂S˃icily, this is
    a Matter wch nearly regards the
    D: of Savoy, and is worth our im­
    ­mediate notice: the most expeditious
    way of sending any orders herevpon
    to our fleet, (your Lordsp knows)
    will be thrô this Kingdom to Ge­
    ­noa

    As to the Interests of the D: of
    Lorraine wch I told mons:r Torcy
    the Queen had ordered Me to
    mention here, as she had instructed
    Her Plenipotentiaries to sustain
    them at Utrecht, I haue as
    favourable an answer as I
    7
    could hope, I send your Lordsp inclosed
    the Memorial I gaue and the an­
    ­swer, and shall impart it to the   N:1.14
    Minister of that Prince here,
    that He may plead the particula­
    ­rities of his Master's pretensi[ons]. 15

    I come to our own point so long
    discussed and so very much em­
    ­broyled, I mean that of New­
    ­foundland

    The Project of a treaty wth16
    France w:ch I brought over was
    received from the Plenipoten:ries
    the 8th Ap: 1712 as I find vpon
    the Endorsement, mons:r de Torcy
    shows Me another Plan entitled
    Projet proposé par l'Angleterre
    received from their Plenip:ries the
    8:th Aug: 1712. I send your Lordsp
    a transcript of the different Ar­
    ­ticles of these 2 projects rela­    N:2 and 3
    ­ting to Newfoundland as like­
    ­wise an extract of some letters
    from our Plenipo:ries to your
    Lordsp and amongst yours I    N:4 and 5.
    presume you will find others
    of the same tenour: I haue
    likewise read over wth monsr
    Torcy what their Plenip:ries
    haue writ vpon the same
    subject, in the whole transaction
    I find a good deal of Brouillon.17
    and by the Expreſs wch came
    3 days since from Utrecht
    it is evident They never will a­
    ­gree till respectiue orders are
    sent for their so doing, from
    hence and from Whitehal.
    after long and sower but civil
    discourses vpon this point
    mons:r Torcy and Desmarais still
    insisting vpon their vndoubted
    and never yeilded right to
    Cap-breton, (in wch I am afraid18
    they are too well founded,) and
    the latter having still his Eye
    vpon their Chapeau-rouge, or
    keeping to the preliminaries wch
    give them the liberty of fish­
    ­ing where they vsed, wch indeed
    was as well along Chapeau rouge
    as the Petit Nort, I say'd it was
    in vain for them to send to Utrecht
    for an Explanation of these
    Matters; for without Placentia
    and the advantages w:ch ought
    naturally to follow it's being
    given vp, that Article could never
    be accorded by the British Nation,
    and that I took only a previous
    liberty of saying this [...]19
    9
    wch the D: of Shrewsbury would
    confirm within these 4 days.
    they agreed that the thing must
    be adjusted here, and at London,
    and mons:r Torcy took notes of
    the several proposals I made,
    amongst wch I confess I did not
    mention the offer of half Cap-
    ­Breton, since the whole had
    been20 offered several months
    before, (as your Lordsp sees) and
    had been rejected: after all, I
    haue received this inclosed propo­
    ­sal from mons:r de Torcy and   N:6
    send it into Eng: for the Queen's
    approbation or refusal: wch I
    would not haue ventured to haue
    done, but that I think it getts
    us safely off from the too ex­
    ­tensive Clause in the Prelimi­
    ­naries, gives us the advantage
    in every part of the fishery,
    leaves the Queen entirely Mis­
    ­tresse of all that is worth having
    in Newfoundland, and does really
    (as Mons:r Desmarais expresses
    it) driue the French au bout
    du monde
    : Mons.r Dowdel, the
    person recommended to Us by
    Gilligham, and a friend or
    two here with whom I haue talked
    concerning this Matter, and who
    haue been at Newfoundland, are
    all agreed that from Cap: Roy
    Northw:d is a fishery yet un­
    ­known and such as has not
    been reckoned worth trying,
    and that the whole fishery ex­
    ­cept a less sort in the petit
    Nort lyes Southd from Bona
    Vista, to C: de Race, and from
    thence along the Bay of Pla­
    ­centia to Chapeau rouge and
    C: Roy: wch is now in her
    Maj:ties hands, without the
    French being any way to in­
    ­terfere ˂therein˃21

    I haue conferred as well at Paris
    as here with the 2 Ministers I
    named before vpon the settling
    and renewing our Commerce:
    I send your Lordsp inclosed a
    little Memorial wch I gaue them,   N:7
    as a sort of text to our confe­
    ­rence and a ground for a
    future treaty: there was no
    need of my explaining the con­
    ­dition of Amicissima Gens
    as the mutual Principle vpon22
    11
    which we desired to stand: this, I
    find, has been distinctly handled
    and abundantly disputed at U­
    ­trecht: the observations that
    Mons:r Desmarais made vpon it
    is very obvious, that vpon this
    Principle we should be with
    France as the Hollanders are: ie.
    as specified in the Tariff of 1664
    that the reason why the Hollan­
    ­ders had in great measure the
    benefit of this Tariff was, That
    they had laid no new Impositi­
    ­ons on the goods of France im­
    ­ported into their provinces: yet
    the Methods of Commerce and
    the necessary Droits wch this
    Kingdom has been forced to
    raise are such as that France
    must deny that Tariff to them
    [the Hollanders]23 particularly as
    to the quatre Especes, whale­
    ­bone and Whale-Oyl; Woolen
    Cloath and Serges: Sugars accor­
    ­ding to their several refine­
    ­ments; and all sort of Salt­
    ­fish in barrel. vpon all w:ch
    heads mons:r Desmarais asserts
    it would be impossible that
    France should trade wth Holland
    except these Commodities and the
    manner of importing them were
    regulated by the Tariff of 1699
    or some other Equivalent propor
    ­tion. vpon the Article of Salt­
    ­fish I was very glad to hear
    mons:r Desmarais say that
    whoever imports it into this
    Kingdom must find it consi­
    ­derably advantageous, my
    thought was that This ought to
    be a fair Argument to Us to
    mind and improve our fishery
    vpon the Coasts of Scotland
    for it is this sort of fish
    wch the Dutch import cheifly
    heither, and wch the French
    mean to bring to the above­24
    ­mentioned Tariff.25

    Monsr Desmarais explains himself
    very much vpon the head of an
    Entiere Prõbition being very preju­
    ­dicial to both Nations, but more
    so to England, He says, than to
    France: and that the High Duties
    on both sides ought to be taken
    off26 and brought to a Iust Mediũ
    wch He thinks impossible to be
    done but by Comis:ers to be named
    13
    to that purpose, for that This must
    cost a great deal of time, for
    the French can only take off their
    Duties as we shall take off ours
    and the Alteration of their Edicts
    must go pari passu with that of27
    Our Acts of Parliament.

    To what I objected that the King
    being absolute Master of his
    Edicts might in the mean time
    take away the entire Prohibition
    of several of our Commodities
    particularly those specified in
    the Edict of 170l. Sep. 6.

    He answered that We had likewise
    entire Prohibitions, for instance
    their Silks were as absolutely
    forbid on our side, as Our Cloth
    is on Their's. and repeated, that
    the taking off the entire Prohibi­
    ­tions as the Alleviating the high
    Duties must go gradually and
    equally28 on both sides, or always
    be made on One side vpon
    Condition that the Other perform
    his part, and be intended to
    take place accordingly at such a
    time, for that if the Prohibi­
    ­tion on the French side were
    (as I seem'd to think reasonable)
    immediately taken off, the English29
    would run a glutt of their Goods
    into France sufficient to serue
    the Nation for Two or Three
    Years: while (says He) We (the
    French)30 shall remain les bras
    croisez
    , the English knowing
    the certain Duties payable in
    France, and the French expecting
    how or in what time the Duties
    vpon their Goods shall be taken
    off in England

    Vpon the whole He has given this
    answer to the Proposals I gaue
    Him as what might serue for
    a ground-work to a treaty of
    Commerce: it was yesterday read
    in Council, and I receiue it
    this Morning from mons:r de Torcy
    together w:th a Scheme of   N:8.
    the cheif Commodities wch
    France sends to Eng:~ wch he
    desires may be returned w:th the
    specific Duties payable in
    Eng:~ vpon every head, and wha[t]31
    time may probably be asked for
    the Alleviating any part of them
    and He desires We should send
    a like Scheme of English Goods
    wch We import cheifly into
    France, and promises to giue
    Us therevpon a reciprocal
    15
    account, the King being very willing
    to open a trade as soon and
    as fairly as possible with
    his old Friends: but He concludes
    that the Confusion and misvn­
    ­derstanding of 20 years will
    not be redressed without a good
    deal of time and labour.

    The vsual Articles therefore of
    a treaty of Commerce, that of
    the Droit d'Aubein,32 that of the
    Tare and what your Lordsp
    sees is pritty nearly adjusted
    may be agreed and signed at
    Utrecht with the treaty of Peace
    but in a distinct Instrument
    and as a treaty of Commerce,
    and ˂˄ in it˃33 the Specialties as to the
    manner of diminishing the
    Droits34 and regulating the tariff
    must be provided for by one
    General Clause.

    I haue waited on mons:r Pontchar­
    ­train and not perceiving that
    the List of Ships taken (as
    we alledge,) contrary to the
    terms of the Cessation or to
    the vsual Maritime laws, wch
    I formerly left wth Him has
    been regarded, I left an other
    List with Him, to wch He says I
    shall haue an answer in few
    days. Iohn Wynne (the poor
    Man so often taken and retaken)
    with his Ship are sett at
    liberty, and our Subjects, of
    wch I haue a long list, (wch
    I think comes from Coll: Nichol­
    ­son) that are, we say, taken
    against their Wills and confined
    at Canada, will haue leaue
    to return to Boston or where­
    ­ever We think proper, provi­
    ­ded they are not habitued in
    Canada, and had rather stay
    there than otherwise: of this
    I shall send You more by my
    next.

    Paris the 29th35 Dec:r 1712
    I told your Lordsp I should hear more
    from the El: of Bavaria, I did so by
    mons:r Torcy last Night: Count Mono­
    ­strole repeats his Master's acknow­
    legements to Her Majty and his
    desire that She will set Him as
    free as her present Circumstances
    of affairs may permit and in a
    visit this morning to monsr Voisin
    he let fall as seeming by chance
    17
    that it was not thought the Dutch
    would ever pretend to garison
    Luxembourg

    Monostrole complains and the
    Ministers here second the com­
    ­plaints, that Bonne the very
    and only residence of the Elr
    of Cologne is to be garisoned by
    Imperial troops, and Liege and
    Huy by Dutch,

    Monostrole has represented from
    his Master to the most Ch: King
    that a formal treaty was made
    in 1704 between the Electrice and
    the late Emp:r Ioseph, not one
    word of wch has been complyed
    with, nor any recompence made
    Him vpon what was therein
    stipulated.

    That the house of Austria not
    to count 13 Millions of florins
    w:ch they formerly owed him
    haue during this war seized all
    his Megazines, Cannon, goods
    plate, Iewels and pictures
    That Rottẽmbourg,36 the adjacent
    Countries, and other large tracts
    of land, w:ch are now compre­
    ­hended in the vpper Pala­
    ­tinate haue been bought by
    the house of Bavaria, [...]37
    à beaux deniers contants,38 and by
    consequence should be reserved
    to Him

    In these points his most Ch: Majty
    would desire the Queen to fa­
    ­vour this Prince, and as he
    has given mons:r Torcy order to
    mention them to Me, the D: d'Au­
    ­mond will likewise haue or­
    ­der to speak of them in
    Eng:~

    Another point vpon w:ch this Court
    is very sollicitous is that the
    Chevalier remaining in any
    town of France obstructs
    the signing the Peace, yet He
    can not go to Lorraine till the
    Emp:rs passeport will secure Him
    there; your Lordsp by the per­
    ­vsal of the papers39 will see   N:9
    the State of that Case: and I
    haue only to add vpon this sub­
    ­ject, that the Court of
    France expresses an Impossibi­
    ­lity on their side to do more
    than they haue done, and hopes
    We should haue Interest enough
    with the Emp:r to obtain
    such passeports from Him as
    may secure as well the person
    19
    who is to go into Lorrain, as
    the D: of Lorraine who is to
    receiue Him

    I haue not heard from Utrecht
    since my arrival in France, but
    I presume, I shall hear in few days,40
    Sunday next being the last day
    allowed for their determination.
    and if you approue the propo­
    ­sal relating to Newfoundland,
    and judge the Scheme of Com­
    ­merce such as may form a41
    general Article, I think We
    are ready, let what will happen
    I am more pleased with the
    Proposal as to Newfoundland
    because I see mons:r Pontchar­
    ­train and some others hear­
    ­tily disquieted at it,

    mons:r Torcy's letters from Utrecht
    say that of the Provinces, Frize
    Utrecht and Gelder were for the
    Peace, and of Holland the towns
    w:ch stood cheifly out were Delft
    Rotterdam and Leyden

    The D: of Argile is here, and desi­
    ­res a yatch may immediately
    be ordered to Calais for his
    passage: He will tell your Lord
    ­sp42 that the affair of Catalonia
    remains in Statu quo; mons:r Torcy
    has received advice that the D:
    of Barwick is within a day's
    march of Starembourg, that
    He has an Army of 50 Squad̃
    and 40 Bat:~ns much Superiour
    to That of the Enemy: mons.r Voisin
    tells Me the French are 2343 thous:d
    effectiue Men: and He reckons
    the Germans not aboue 13 thous:d
    the D: of Argile computes the
    Germans to be nearer 20 thous:d

    For home News, I saw the Dau­
    ­phin yesterday He was brought
    to the King at table: the Child
    looks very well, a little pale,
    He is handsom;44 and seems to
    haue a good deal of Spirit.

    I expect the D: of Shrewsbury
    here on Saturday or Sunday.
    We haue taken a rambling
    appartement for Him in
    l'hotel Soissons, w:ch was
    the best however that We could
    find ˂˄ in˃45 all Paris

    I haue writt rather a Iournal
    than a letter, the diversity of
    the Subjects w:ch it contains
    must plead my Excuse: in every
    part of it I haue done my best
    for the Queens service and I
    leaue it to your great [...]46
    21
    friendship to Me to giue it the
    most candid Interpretation.

    La Vigne brings instructions to
    D: d'Aumond vpon many [o]f47 the
    Heads in my letter, and by Him
    again in case you send no
    Messenger of Her Majty imme­
    ­diately, I may haue your
    Answer.

    I am with great truth
    and respect
    My Lord
    Your Lordsp's most obt
    and most humble Sert

    MPrior.


    I humbly refer my Ld Dartmouth
    to what I haue writ to your
    Lordsp.

    2.

    Endorsed:
    Letter48 from
    Mr Prior Dec: 28th 1712
    & 29th dõ49

    Notes
    1.
    Prior has numbered every other page, that is the rectos, of this document in the upper right-hand corner. All references to page numbers are to Prior's numbers.
    2.
    The "/17" is in the darker ink Prior introduced on p. 16 with the second dateline.
    3.
    With the original manuscript, there is a detached leaf immediately preceding in the volume on folio 203. It bears this address in P's hand: "To Ld Bolingbroke". There is no other writing on this leaf on either the recto or the verso; the paper itself is smaller than that for the letter. It is not certain that this address page belongs with this letter, but for further discussion see note 5. The letterbook copy is labeled "Letter to Lord Visc:t Bolingbroke."
    4.
    This NS/OS date has been changed from the original single NS date and with a correction of the original date. The changes are in the same darker ink of the dateline revision. The original date is a double-digit number but what underlies the 8 cannot be read. In clear text, the date Prior settled on is "18.th/7".
    5.
    At the bottom far-left corner of this first page and pages 5, 9, 13, and 17 (all rectos), the initials "CS" (or possibly a minuscule l followed by the majuscule S) and "B" appear, the "B" under the "CS". The last, i.e. twenty-second, page also includes the marking "CS [over] B 6". This verso, folio 214v, is the endorsement page. It is possible that folios 203 and 214 constituted a wrapper for the letter.
    6.
    Prior signaled this interlinear insertion with a caret.
    7.
    I.e. Ferdinand-Auguste Solaro, Comte de Monasterol (Saint-Simon 7: 901)
    8.
    Slight wear at the edge of the paper has obscured the shape of what must be a t.
    9.
    Prior inserted "out" on the line, connecting it to the h of "with".
    10.
    All underscoring is Prior's.
    11.
    The last word on this page has been omitted because it is repeated as the first word on the next page.
    12.
    Slight wear at the edge of the paper has obscured what must be an l.
    13.
    I.e. Joseph-Emmanuel, Cardinal de la Trémoïlle (Saint-Simon 7: 1058)
    14.
    Prior highlighted several points by numbering them. In the original document, the numbers are in the left-hand margin rather than the right. To distinguish them from adjacent text, the editor has highlighted them in bold.
    15.
    Wear together with a tear in the original document has obliterated nearly all of the strokes that formed the end of the word.
    16.
    To the left of the first two lines of this paragraph there is a large X, apparently a highlighting mark made by Bolingbroke.
    17.
    The English definition of brouillon is restricted to "a rough draft" (OED Online); but it seems likely that Prior used the word in its French sense of mischief-making (Petit Larousse Illustré, 1921). It has been encoded as a foreign word.
    18.
    In the margin to the left of the word Cap-breton, there is a large X.
    19.
    The last word on this page has been omitted because it is repeated as the first word on the next page.
    20.
    In the margin to the left of the word been there is a large X.
    21.
    This last word in the paragraph was probably added by Prior after initial composition. It is not in the letterbook copy.
    22.
    The last twelve lines on this page have been highlighted by a large X to the left and a vertical line drawn down the length of the left margin.
    23.
    These square brackets are Prior's.
    24.
    Though not so represented, the syllables "above" are emphasized with underscoring.
    25.
    A very small x is in the margin to the left of "­mentioned".
    26.
    There is an X in the margin to the left of the word off.
    27.
    This point is highlighted by a large X in the left margin.
    28.
    There is an X in the margin to the left of the word equally.
    29.
    This last word on page 13 is positioned like a catchword but is not repeated on the next page.
    30.
    The editor has supplied the closing parenthesis omitted by Prior.
    31.
    The accuracy of the supplied character is confirmed by the letterbook copy.
    32.
    I.e. Droit d'Aubaine
    33.
    Prior signaled this interlinear insertion with a caret.
    34.
    There is an X in the margin to the left of the word Droits.
    35.
    The numeral 2 is heavily inked and obscures an underlying numeral. The accuracy of the numeral 29 is confirmed by the letterbook copy.
    36.
    I.e. Rottenburg
    37.
    The last word on this page has been omitted because it is repeated as the first word on the next page.
    38.
    I.e. à beaux deniers comptants
    39.
    The manuscript copy in SP 105/266 includes a marginal note (f. 230v) in what is probably the hand of the 2nd Earl of Stair, who succeeded Prior as Minister Plenipotentiary at Paris in 1715 and who brought the order for Prior to surrender his correspondence for examination by the new Whig government (See Directory of Correspondents). The note begins "I find no such papers…".
    40.
    The original document is torn here, and the a of "days" is partially obscured as a result.
    41.
    This point is highlighted by a large X in the left margin.
    42.
    Though not so represented, this second syllable is written thus: sp.
    43.
    The second numeral may have been revised by Prior from a 5 to a 3. The letterbook copy confirms the reading of "23".
    44.
    This semicolon may be only a comma confused by a stray drop of ink spatter.
    45.
    Prior signaled this interlinear insertion with a caret.
    46.
    The last word on this page has been omitted because it is repeated as the first word of the next page.
    47.
    There is a hole in the paper at this point; the ascender and descender of the f remain, but the rest of the word is now missing. The accuracy of the supplied text is confirmed by the letterbook copy.
    48.
    This word is in a different hand than the rest of the endorsement.
    49.
    The endorsement was written sideways, which is not uncommon; and the marking "CS [over] B 6." runs parallel to it on the opposite side of the page. Faintly visible beneath preservation material is the numeral "2."